Please help reunite Peri with her biological mother (Carla Moquin) and biological
sisters, Alpha and Echo. Peri's adoption at birth was procured through the
extensive fraud of her now-adoptive parents, Susan Englert and Demyn Plantenberg,
and I am working to regain custody of her. I have the support and assistance
of several professionals in this effort, and I plan to keep Peri in contact
with her adoptive parents if I am able to regain custody, for Peri's well-being. |

California case law and statutes make clear that fraud in procuring
an adoption is grounds for rescission of the adoption and return of custody to
the biological parent, and there is California case law holding that an adoption
can be conditioned on an agreement for post-adoption contact. There is
no California case holding that fraud is not sufficient grounds for rescission
and return of custody. According to California law, if an adoption was procured
by fraud, the relinquishment signed by the biological parent is not valid
and the adoption is null. There is no California case law contradicting
these principles for rescission of an adoption if fraud is proven. |
Of course, Peri's well-being and best interests are my primary concern
and are why I filed this lawsuit in the first place and why I have spent many hundreds of hours trying to fix this situation. I am working with numerous experts to ensure a positive transition and preservation of Peri's bond with Susan and Demyn in a healthy way, because I and the experts who are helping me all believe that this would be in Peri's best interests. One of Susan and Demyn's major arguments has been that even if there was fraud, because Peri has been with them until now, they believe that her best interests involve staying with them. However, given that Susan and Demyn fabricated a story (which has now clearly been proven false) in order to prevent evidence-gathering and delay the case by nearly two years, this argument carries little weight. In addition, several experts (and many other people supporting my efforts) believe that Peri's best interests involve her return to my care as soon as possible. |
Susan and Demyn have clearly admitted that they always intended to legally designate the adoption as closed, which prevented our family
from having any legally enforceable contact rights whatsoever and ensured that
they could completely eliminate our contact with Peri at any time. Intent
is the hardest component to prove in a fraud case, and I have a clear, sworn
admission of the intent needed to prove my case. I also have extensive evidence
documenting what happened, the suspicious timing of Susan and Demyn's cutting
off of contact just after finalization, and their leading us on for years
by telling us that things would get better with time. |
Susan and Demyn went to extensive lengths to procure my consent to Peri's
adoption while simultaneously going to great lengths to ensure that they
could avoid being held to a single promise they made to our family. Within
days after the adoption was finalized, they began treating her biological parents--and
even her biological sisters--with callousness and disregard. Their
clear admission in the lawsuit of their prior intent from before Peri's birth not to provide us
with any legally enforceable contact (while they were telling us that they considered
us close friends and part of their family, participating in a documentary
about the openness, promising us extensive contact, and signing the contact agreement
that clearly states it was to be filed) illustrates their lack of remorse
or concern for what they have done and raises grave concerns about their lack
of compassion and sensitivity as Peri's adoptive parents. Their actions
show that they either lack understanding or don't care about the implications
for Peri if she ever discovers how they procured her adoption, or if she sees
the Discovery show and wants to know why she doesn't see her sisters more than
once a year. The most likely result is that Peri would come to believe that
we did not want to see her--which would likely be very detrimental for her emotional
well-being. |


My case is extremely strong because Susan and Demyn have clearly admitted
their prior intent--at the time of meeting us and signing the Contact Agreement--not
to file the contact agreement at finalization of Peri's adoption.
|